People v. Canty

23 A.D.3d 1066, 803 N.Y.S.2d 493
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James R Punch, J.), rendered June 21, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [12]), defendant challenges County Court’s suppression rulings. Those challenges are encompassed by defendant’s knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal {see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Gilbert, 17 AD3d 1164 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 762 [2005]; see generally People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 285 [1992]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Canty, 23 A.D.3d 1066, 803 N.Y.S.2d 493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 1066 (People v. Canty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosado
26 A.D.3d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)