People v. Cantwell

235 A.D.2d 308, 652 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cantwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 A.D.2d 606

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered on or about December 5, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application [309]*309to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cantwell, 235 A.D.2d 308, 652 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 308 (People v. Cantwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)