People v. Cantwell
This text of 255 A.D. 893 (People v. Cantwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in Essex county clerk’s office February 7, 1931, upon the decision of the court. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for sixty dollars against defendant as a penalty under section 182 of the Conservation Law, for possession of dogs within the Adirondack Park without a license. , The dogs were in leash and not at liberty. The facts do not bring the prosecution within the intent of the Conservation Law. Judgment reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, but with printing disbursements. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Crapser, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 893, 7 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cantwell-nyappdiv-1938.