People v. Canteen

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2026
Docket2023-03529
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Canteen (People v. Canteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Canteen, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Canteen - 2026 NY Slip Op 01979

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

People v Canteen

2026 NY Slip Op 01979

April 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dejanay Canteen, also known as King Canteen, appellant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on April 1, 2026

2023-03529, (Ind. No. 86/20)

Francesca E. Connolly, J.P.

Linda Christopher

Helen Voutsinas

Laurence L. Love

Elena Goldberg Velazquez, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anders Nelson of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Matthew B. White of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Alexander Jeong, J.), imposed May 16, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, VOUTSINAS, LOVE and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI