People v. Cannistraci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cannistraci

54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 1, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Concur&emdash;Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Birns and Silverman, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I have grave doubts as to the admissibility of the testimony of the witness, Thaler, which was offered by the prosecution to establish an admission by silence on the part of this defendant, nevertheless the totality of the evidence as to the defendant’s guilt, disclosed in the record, is such that the conviction should not be disturbed (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 1, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Concur&emdash;Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Birns and Silverman, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I have grave doubts as to the admissibility of the testimony of the witness, Thaler, which was offered by the prosecution to establish an admission by silence on the part of this defendant, nevertheless the totality of the evidence as to the defendant’s guilt, disclosed in the record, is such that the conviction should not be disturbed (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

People v. Cannistraci, 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 631 (People v. Cannistraci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related