People v. Cannistraci
This text of 54 A.D.2d 631 (People v. Cannistraci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 1, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Concur&emdash;Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Birns and Silverman, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I have grave doubts as to the admissibility of the testimony of the witness, Thaler, which was offered by the prosecution to establish an admission by silence on the part of this defendant, nevertheless the totality of the evidence as to the defendant’s guilt, disclosed in the record, is such that the conviction should not be disturbed (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cannistraci-nyappdiv-1976.