People v. Candelaria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Candelaria

137 A.D.3d 680, 27 N.Y.S.3d 375

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2016·No. 648 4811/12·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), rendered on or about November 7, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), rendered on or about November 7, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.

People v. Candelaria, 137 A.D.3d 680, 27 N.Y.S.3d 375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

137 A.D.3d 680 (People v. Candelaria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.