People v. Cancel

92 A.D.3d 891, 938 N.Y.2d 814
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 2012·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Shaffer, 81 AD3d 989 [2011]; People v Budden, 77 AD3d 672 [2010]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record, and therefore cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Brewer, 73 AD3d 1199 [2010]). Dillon, J.P, Florio, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cancel, 92 A.D.3d 891, 938 N.Y.2d 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

92 A.D.3d 891 (People v. Cancel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Franco
104 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Cohen
100 A.D.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Appling
94 A.D.3d 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)