People v. Canale

166 A.D. 961, 154 N.Y.S. 932

This text of 166 A.D. 961 (People v. Canale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Canale, 166 A.D. 961, 154 N.Y.S. 932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon the conclusion of the evidence, the court having ruled that the only issue of fact to be determined by the jury was that of permitting gambling upon the premises where liquor was being sold, it was error to refuse to advise the jury to disregard the evidence of acts of prostitution and of maintaining a house of ill-fame. It was also error to admit in evidence, over the objection and exception of the defendant, the records of convictions of May Wilson and Grace Ellis. ■ It was also error to receive in evidence, over the defendant’s objection and exception, the testimony of the witnesses given in the City Court upon the trial of the [962]*962defendant under an accusation of a crime not involved in this ease. The, judgment of conviction of the defendant should be reversed and a new trial granted. All concurred. Judgment of conviction reversed and new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D. 961, 154 N.Y.S. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-canale-nyappdiv-1915.