People v. Canal
This text of 24 A.D.3d 1034 (People v. Canal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered August 1, 2003 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
Defendant was observed on Dana Avenue in the City of Albany drinking beer from a bottle. He was arrested for violating the City of Albany’s open container ordinance, and a subsequent search of his person revealed nine pieces of crack cocaine. As a consequence, defendant was indicted and charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees. Following a Dunaway/Mapp hearing, where defendant unsuccessfully sought to suppress the cocaine, he pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of SVa to 7 years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, where, as here, the police arrest a person for an offense committed in their presence, they are justified in conducting a search incident to that arrest (see People v Pantusco, 107 AD2d 854, 855-856 [1985] [search incident to arrest for violation of open container ordinance]).
Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.3d 1034, 805 N.Y.S.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-canal-nyappdiv-2005.