People v. Campos

171 A.D.2d 521, 567 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3461
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.D.2d 521 (People v. Campos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Campos, 171 A.D.2d 521, 567 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.), rendered October 30, 1987, convicting defendant after jury trial of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him as a predicate violent felon to a prison term of five to ten years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was found guilty of assault in the first degree on evidence that he struck Luis Nieves in the left arm with a machete, slicing down into the bone, while repeatedly screaming, "I’m going to kill you.”

Defendant was not entitled to a charge on assault in the second or third degrees as lesser included offenses of assault in the first degree, as no reasonable view of the evidence would support a finding that defendant committed the lesser offenses but not the greater (CPL 300.50 [1]; People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61). In this regard, defendant does not contest that the complainant suffered a serious physical injury, but argues nonetheless that the jury may have found that defendant intended only to cause physical injury, or was negligent. We believe that the evidence, viewed rationally, ruled out anything less than the intent to cause serious physical injury.

[522]*522The court did not abuse its discretion by denying a hearing on defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. Although defense counsel raised the issue that a juror deliberately perjured herself by withholding from the court information as to her prior arrest and swearing that she had never been arrested, the motion papers were unsupported by sworn allegations of facts as required by statute. (CPL 330.40 [2] [e].) Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Arzu
240 A.D.2d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D.2d 521, 567 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campos-nyappdiv-1991.