People v. Campiglia

258 A.D. 916, 16 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county, convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery in the first degree, as a second offender, and order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial unanimously affirmed. While we believe that counsel for the defendant should have been permitted to examine the statements of the witnesses Lamb, Wagner and Griffiths, which had been made to the authorities and which the witnesses had used to refresh their recollection immediately prior to testifying, failure to do so was harmless. The statements were submitted on the argument, and an examination of them discloses nothing inconsistent with the testimony of any of the witnesses given at the trial. (People v. Miller, 257 N. Y. 54.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campiglia, 258 A.D. 916, 16 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 916 (People v. Campiglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doxtator v. Swarthout
38 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
People v. Campiglia
283 A.D. 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)