People v. Campiglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Campiglia

258 A.D. 916, 16 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 916 (People v. Campiglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Campiglia, 258 A.D. 916, 16 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county, convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery in the first degree, as a second offender, and order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial unanimously affirmed. While we believe that counsel for the defendant should have been permitted to examine the statements of the witnesses Lamb, Wagner and Griffiths, which had been made to the authorities and which the witnesses had used to refresh their recollection immediately prior to testifying, failure to do so was harmless. The statements were submitted on the argument, and an examination of them discloses nothing inconsistent with the testimony of any of the witnesses given at the trial. (People v. Miller, 257 N. Y. 54.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county, convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery in the first degree, as a second offender, and order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial unanimously affirmed. While we believe that counsel for the defendant should have been permitted to examine the statements of the witnesses Lamb, Wagner and Griffiths, which had been made to the authorities and which the witnesses had used to refresh their recollection immediately prior to testifying, failure to do so was harmless. The statements were submitted on the argument, and an examination of them discloses nothing inconsistent with the testimony of any of the witnesses given at the trial. (People v. Miller, 257 N. Y. 54.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 916, 16 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campiglia-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack