People v. Campbell

117 A.D.3d 421, 985 N.Y.S.2d 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 A.D.3d 5

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J), entered on or about October 7, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of defendant’s motion for resentencing (see e.g. People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]) in light of his “chronic inability to control his behavior while at liberty” (People v Correa, 83 AD3d 555, 556 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 805 [2011]). Defendant has numerous felony convictions, including convictions for felonies committed while on parole, as well as an unfavorable prison disciplinary record, and he has not established that his physical condition has rendered him unlikely to commit any future offenses.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Friedman, Andrias, Saxe and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 117 A.D.3d 421, 985 N.Y.S.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

117 A.D.3d 421 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Correa
83 A.D.3d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)