People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Campbell

5 A.D.3d 290, 773 N.Y.S.2d 544, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3462

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.3d 290 (People v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Campbell, 5 A.D.3d 290, 773 N.Y.S.2d 544, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 30, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

[291]*291The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence established that defendant was not licensed or privileged to enter the victim’s apartment at the time of the crime, and that defendant was aware of this fact. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 30, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

[291]*291The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence established that defendant was not licensed or privileged to enter the victim’s apartment at the time of the crime, and that defendant was aware of this fact. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.3d 290, 773 N.Y.S.2d 544, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campbell-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack