People v. Campbell
158 A.D.2d 464, 551 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.2d 743 →
Opinion
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for [465]*465leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 63.1; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY 606). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Campbell, 158 A.D.2d 464, 551 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 464 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Reynolds v. . Commerce Fire Ins. Co. of N.Y.
47 N.Y. 597 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Beck v. Motler
54 A.D.2d 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)