People v. Campbell

111 A.D.2d 929, 491 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.2d 437

Opinion

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), each rendered October 21,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

The issue raised by defendant as to the adequacy of his plea allocutions was not preserved for review as a matter of law {People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Further, no adequate reason has been set forth as to why defendant’s sentences, imposed in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreements, should be set aside {People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 111 A.D.2d 929, 491 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

111 A.D.2d 929 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)