People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Campbell

111 A.D.2d 929, 491 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 929 (People v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Campbell, 111 A.D.2d 929, 491 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), each rendered October 21,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

The issue raised by defendant as to the adequacy of his plea allocutions was not preserved for review as a matter of law {People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Further, no adequate reason has been set forth as to why defendant’s sentences, imposed in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreements, should be set aside {People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), each rendered October 21,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

The issue raised by defendant as to the adequacy of his plea allocutions was not preserved for review as a matter of law {People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Further, no adequate reason has been set forth as to why defendant’s sentences, imposed in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreements, should be set aside {People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 929, 491 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campbell-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack