People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Campbell

25 A.D.2d 567, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 567 (People v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Campbell, 25 A.D.2d 567, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 15, 1964, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered June 15, 1962, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Order reversed on the law and matter remitted to the Criminal Term for a hearing, before a Justice other than the one who accepted defendant’s plea, solely on the question whether defendant’s plea was induced by a statement of the Trial Judge that defendant was guilty and that he faced a sentence of 20 years if convicted (People v. Huarneck, 22 A D 2d 651). In our opinion, the other points raised by defendant are without merit.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 15, 1964, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered June 15, 1962, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Order reversed on the law and matter remitted to the Criminal Term for a hearing, before a Justice other than the one who accepted defendant’s plea, solely on the question whether defendant’s plea was induced by a statement of the Trial Judge that defendant was guilty and that he faced a sentence of 20 years if convicted (People v. Huarneck, 22 A D 2d 651). In our opinion, the other points raised by defendant are without merit.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 567, 267 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campbell-nyappdiv-1966.