People v. Camp

781 N.W.2d 803, 486 Mich. 914
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 2010·No. 139984·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

781 N.W.2d 803 (2010)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas Eugene CAMP, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139984. COA No. 285101.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 21, 2010.

Order

On May 11, 2010, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals because the trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant consented to the mistrial declared by the court. Where a defendant consents to a mistrial, double jeopardy considerations do not apply. United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 607, 96 S.Ct. 1075, 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues raised by the defendant but not addressed by that court during its initial review of the case.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Camp, 781 N.W.2d 803, 486 Mich. 914 (Mich. 2010).

781 N.W.2d 803 (People v. Camp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People of Michigan v. Melvin Earl Howard
Michigan Supreme Court, 2017
Douglas Camp v. Mary Berghuis
601 F. App'x 380 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Idalski v. Schwedt
781 N.W.2d 803 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)