People v. Cameron
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered January 16, 2007, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment.
[898]*898Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
62 A.D.3d 897 (People v. Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.