People v. Cambridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cambridge

175 A.D.2d 254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 A.D.2d 254 (People v. Cambridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cambridge, 175 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), dated September 25, 1989, as granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of a two-count indictment charging the defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, on the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of the indictment is denied, the first count of the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment (see, People v Timmons, 127 AD2d 806; see also, People v Blue, 173 AD2d 836). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), dated September 25, 1989, as granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of a two-count indictment charging the defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, on the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of the indictment is denied, the first count of the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment (see, People v Timmons, 127 AD2d 806; see also, People v Blue, 173 AD2d 836). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cambridge-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack