People v. Camble
This text of 17 A.D.3d 235 (People v. Camble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[236]*236Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J., at pleas; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered August 14, 2003 and September 23, 2003, convicting defendant, upon her pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the sentences and remanding for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.
The People did not file a predicate felony statement and the court never adjudicated defendant a second felony offender. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that a remand for resentencing is warranted in the interest of justice (compare People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140 [1985]). We further note and, as the People concede, since the crimes for which the DNA databank fee was imposed were committed before the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [e]) providing for the imposition of such fees, that fee should not have been imposed. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 A.D.3d 235, 793 N.Y.S.2d 393, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-camble-nyappdiv-2005.