People v. Camarena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Camarena

282 A.D.2d 210, 722 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 210 (People v. Camarena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Camarena, 282 A.D.2d 210, 722 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from [211]*211judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Lloyd Barrett, J.), rendered January 13, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years and 2V2 to 5 years, held in abeyance, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court to conduct a reconstruction hearing in accordance with the decision herein.

The record is sufficiently ambiguous with respect to whether or not defendant was present at the sidebar conferences during the second round of jury selection, December 2, 1998, to warrant a reconstruction hearing (see, People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from [211]*211judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Lloyd Barrett, J.), rendered January 13, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years and 2V2 to 5 years, held in abeyance, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court to conduct a reconstruction hearing in accordance with the decision herein.

The record is sufficiently ambiguous with respect to whether or not defendant was present at the sidebar conferences during the second round of jury selection, December 2, 1998, to warrant a reconstruction hearing (see, People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 210, 722 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-camarena-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack