People v. Camacho

2018 NY Slip Op 6762
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Camacho. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 N.Y.S.3d 883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 2018·No. 2015-05903·Published

Opinion

People v Camacho (2018 NY Slip Op 06762)
People v Camacho
2018 NY Slip Op 06762
Decided on October 10, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 10, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2015-05903
(Ind. No. 4606/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Roberto Camacho, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), rendered June 30, 2015, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing sentence upon his previous conviction of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(2-a). Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Camacho, 2018 NY Slip Op 6762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 6762 (People v. Camacho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)