People v. Camacho

85 A.D.3d 634, 925 N.Y.S.2d 819
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Camacho. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 A.D.3d 1393

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John E Collins, J.), rendered July 8, 2010, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of nine years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously reversed, on the law, the resentence vacated and the original sentence without postrelease supervision reinstated.

Defendant is entitled to relief under People v Williams (14 NY3d 198 [2010]), which invalidates the imposition of post-release supervision upon resentencing of defendants who have been released after completing their original sentences. Only those defendants who are still in custody or are on conditional release may be thus resentenced (see also People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

The resentencing proceeding was commenced shortly before defendant’s scheduled release from custody. While the proceeding was pending, he was released after serving his full sentence; no conditional release was involved. The Feople assert that defendant was primarily responsible for the fact that he was [635]*635resentenced after completing his original sentence. However, the record does not support that claim (see People v Deuras, 82 AD3d 528 [2011]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Camacho, 85 A.D.3d 634, 925 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

85 A.D.3d 634 (People v. Camacho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
925 N.E.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Deuras
82 A.D.3d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)