People v. Camacho

11 A.D.3d 285, 782 N.Y.S.2d 463, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Camacho. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 876

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), rendered October 4, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of nine years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The People disproved defendant’s agency defense beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 74-75 [1978], cert denied 439 US 935 [1978]). The evidence overwhelmingly supported the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug-selling operation, with an ongoing working relationship with the other participants, and that he was not acting as an extension of the buyer. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Camacho, 11 A.D.3d 285, 782 N.Y.S.2d 463, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 285 (People v. Camacho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)