People v. Camacho
286 A.D.2d 687, 729 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Camacho. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 876 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 2001·Published
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), imposed January 21, 1998, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733). Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Camacho, 286 A.D.2d 687, 729 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
286 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Camacho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)