People v. Calvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Calvo

40 A.D.2d 982, 338 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 982 (People v. Calvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Calvo, 40 A.D.2d 982, 338 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 2,1972, which granted defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. In our opinion, ¡the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued was legally sufficient (United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102, 105-112; United States v. Harris, 403 U. S. 573, 577). The affidavit, executed by a police officer experienced in the fiéld of narcotics, provides a detailed recital, based upon personal observation, of a pattern of surreptitious and highly suspicious activities by persons known to the police to be involved in narcotics trafficking. In our opinion, the facts contained in the affidavit were more than sufficient to establish the requisite probable 'cause to justify the issuance of the search warrant (People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270; People v. Meyers, 38 A D [983]*9832d 484). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 2,1972, which granted defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. In our opinion, ¡the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued was legally sufficient (United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102, 105-112; United States v. Harris, 403 U. S. 573, 577). The affidavit, executed by a police officer experienced in the fiéld of narcotics, provides a detailed recital, based upon personal observation, of a pattern of surreptitious and highly suspicious activities by persons known to the police to be involved in narcotics trafficking. In our opinion, the facts contained in the affidavit were more than sufficient to establish the requisite probable 'cause to justify the issuance of the search warrant (People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270; People v. Meyers, 38 A D [983]*9832d 484). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 982, 338 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calvo-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack