People v. Callendar

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Callendar

683 N.E.2d 332, 90 N.Y.2d 831, 660 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1359

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 683 N.E.2d 332 (People v. Callendar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Callendar, 683 N.E.2d 332, 90 N.Y.2d 831, 660 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1359 (N.Y. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The People’s sole argument is that a prejudice standard, rather than the per se error rule, should apply to Rosario violations raised by CPL 440.10 motions made before defendant’s direct appeal is concluded (see also, People v Machado, 90 NY2d 187 [decided today]). Having failed to raise this specific issue before the hearing court, the People have not preserved their claim for our review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI