People v. Callagy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Callagy

155 A.D.2d 682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Callagy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Callagy, 155 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered September 6, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under indictment No. 618/88, and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under superior court information No. W-425-88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered September 6, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under indictment No. 618/88, and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under superior court information No. W-425-88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.D.2d 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-callagy-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack