People v. Caliste
This text of 122 A.D.3d 765 (People v. Caliste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered July 10, 2013, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed
The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence or otherwise raise the issue in the Supreme Court (see People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168, 182 [2013]; People v Murray, 15 NY3d 725, 726 [2010]; People v Jackson, 114 AD3d 807 [2014]; People v Slide, 113 AD3d 881, 882 [2014]; People v Hernandez, 110 AD3d 919 [2013]; cf. People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 363-364 [2013]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Haffiz, 19 NY3d 883, 884 [2012]; People v Alexander, 19 NY3d 203, 219 [2012]; People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869, 870-871 [1998]; cf. People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d at 366).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.3d 765, 994 N.Y.S.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caliste-nyappdiv-2014.