People v. California Central Airlines

California Supreme Court

People v. California Central Airlines

268 P.2d 744, 42 Cal. 2d 877

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 2, 1954

DocketL. A. No. 22880

StatusPublished

This text of 268 P.2d 744 (People v. California Central Airlines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. California Central Airlines, 268 P.2d 744, 42 Cal. 2d 877 (Cal. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The complaint presents the same issues as those involved in the case of People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., a corporation, L. A. No. 22881, ante, p. 621 [268 P.2d 723], this day decided. Any difference in factual background in that this company is not federally certificated, that it operates entirely intrastate, and that it did not petition for review of the commission’s decision and order of April 24, 1951, does not affect the result.

The judgment is reversed.

SCHAUER, J.

For the reasons and upon the grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., L. A. No. 22881, this day filed (ante, p. 621 [268 P.2d 723]), I would affirm the judgment.

Edmonds, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The complaint presents the same issues as those involved in the case of People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., a corporation, L. A. No. 22881, ante, p. 621 [268 P.2d 723], this day decided. Any difference in factual background in that this company is not federally certificated, that it operates entirely intrastate, and that it did not petition for review of the commission’s decision and order of April 24, 1951, does not affect the result.

The judgment is reversed.

SCHAUER, J.

For the reasons and upon the grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., L. A. No. 22881, this day filed (ante, p. 621 [268 P.2d 723]), I would affirm the judgment.

Edmonds, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 P.2d 744, 42 Cal. 2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-california-central-airlines-cal-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack