People v. Calhoun
3 Wend. 420
Opinion
By the Court,
The magistrate misapprehended his duty in refusing the adjournment unless his fees for drawing the bond were paid. The payment of the fees was not a condition precedent to the adjournment of the cause; and the magistrate erred in withholding from the party his right on account of the non-payment of them. We therefore advise the court of sessions to proceed to judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Calhoun, 3 Wend. 420 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).
3 Wend. 420 (People v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Devery v. Jerome
36 Misc. 256 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
People v. Monk
8 Utah 35 (Utah Supreme Court, 1892)