People v. Calhoun

3 Wend. 420
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Marcy, J.

The magistrate misapprehended his duty in refusing the adjournment unless his fees for drawing the bond were paid. The payment of the fees was not a condition precedent to the adjournment of the cause; and the magistrate erred in withholding from the party his right on account of the non-payment of them. We therefore advise the court of sessions to proceed to judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Calhoun, 3 Wend. 420 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

3 Wend. 420 (People v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Devery v. Jerome
36 Misc. 256 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
People v. Monk
8 Utah 35 (Utah Supreme Court, 1892)