People v. Calhoun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Calhoun

288 A.D.2d 882, 732 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 882 (People v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Calhoun, 288 A.D.2d 882, 732 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). That waiver encompasses defendant’s present contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). In any event, defendant received the bargained-for sentence (see, People v McGovern, 265 AD2d 881, lv denied 94 NY2d 882). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). That waiver encompasses defendant’s present contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). In any event, defendant received the bargained-for sentence (see, People v McGovern, 265 AD2d 881, lv denied 94 NY2d 882). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 882, 732 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calhoun-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack