People v. Caldwell

289 A.D.2d 502, 735 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12926
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 308 A.D.2d 658

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered February 22, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Caldwell, 289 A.D.2d 502, 735 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 502 (People v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)