People v. Caldwell

152 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D.2d 581

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant failed to demonstrate that a conflict of interest, or a significant possibility thereof, existed and, therefore, reversal is not required (see, People v Recupero, 73 NY2d 877, 879; People v McDonald, 68 NY2d 1, 9). We further find that defendant was adequately represented. The proof of guilt was overwhelming and the judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them either unpreserved or without merit. [992]*992(Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J.— robbery, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Caldwell, 152 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 991 (People v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McDonald
496 N.E.2d 844 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Recupero
535 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)