People v. Caldwell (Daniel)
This text of People v. Caldwell (Daniel) (People v. Caldwell (Daniel)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Daniel Caldwell, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered September 23, 2014, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of driving while impaired, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered September 23, 2014, affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of driving while ability impaired (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[1]) was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The inconsistencies in the testimony and other credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the trier of fact, and we find no basis on the record to disturb its findings.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: April 19, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Caldwell (Daniel), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caldwell-daniel-nyappterm-2018.