People v. Calderon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Calderon

38 A.D.3d 564, 830 N.Y.S.2d 521

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.3d 564 (People v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Calderon, 38 A.D.3d 564, 830 N.Y.S.2d 521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), rendered October 6, 2005, convicting him of criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions on the appeal from the judgment are unpreserved for appellate review as they were not raised before the County Court at the time of sentencing (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315 [2004]; People v Johnson, 16 AD3d 521, 522 [2005]). To the extent that the appellant seeks review of a postjudgment order entered March 1, 2006, that order is [565]*565not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Spolzino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), rendered October 6, 2005, convicting him of criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions on the appeal from the judgment are unpreserved for appellate review as they were not raised before the County Court at the time of sentencing (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315 [2004]; People v Johnson, 16 AD3d 521, 522 [2005]). To the extent that the appellant seeks review of a postjudgment order entered March 1, 2006, that order is [565]*565not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Spolzino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.3d 564, 830 N.Y.S.2d 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calderon-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack