People v. Calderon
This text of 251 A.D.2d 207 (People v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered July 19, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s contention that the prosecutor improperly elicited implied hearsay testimony is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the testimony provided relevant background information explaining the police officers’ actions (see, People v Li, 238 AD2d 277).
Defendant’s claim that the court did not meaningfully respond to a jury note regarding whether more than one person could constructively possess the gun recovered from the van in which defendant was seated is also unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court’s affirmative response meaningfully answered the jury’s inquiry. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 207, 675 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calderon-nyappdiv-1998.