People v. Calderon

88 A.D.2d 604, 449 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16788
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 604 (People v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Calderon, 88 A.D.2d 604, 449 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), rendered December 2, 1979, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the sixth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress physical evidence granted, indictment dismissed and case remitted to Criminal Term for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The People failed to establish at the suppression hearing that there was probable cause to arrest the defendant. Both the LSD and the $181 found on defendant must be suppressed (see People v Delgado, 79 AD2d 976). We note as well that the prosecutor improperly conducted his cross-examination of defendant by repeatedly inquiring as to whether she thought the prosecution’s witnesses were lying (People v Delgado, supra). Moreover, he was overzealous in his summation by making reference to matters outside of the evidence and appealing to the jurors’ emotions by intemperate remarks referring to the jurors and their families as victims and dramatizing the relationship between the use of narcotics and crimes of violence. Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cosme
110 A.D.3d 1096 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Berrios
298 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Ruffule
172 A.D.2d 1053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. DeJesus
137 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Simms
130 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Jones
132 Misc. 2d 207 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Csikortas
106 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Sepulveda
105 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Petralia
464 N.E.2d 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Walston
99 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Waterman
122 Misc. 2d 489 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1984)
People v. Figueroa
94 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Petralia
93 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.2d 604, 449 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calderon-nyappdiv-1982.