People v. Calandra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Calandra

190 A.D.2d 643, 595 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2209

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Calandra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Calandra, 190 A.D.2d 643, 595 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Defendants, former officers of a national bank, by way of motion, seek an order reversing a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting them, after jury trial, of violations of Banking Law § 673. Movants assert, and the People agree, that the convictions must be vacated on the basis of this Court’s ruling in People v Calandra and People v Levine (164 AD2d 638, Iv denied 77 NY2d 997), which reversed prior convictions against defendants, also involving asserted violations of Banking Law § 673, on the ground that the State law is in conflict with a parallel Federal provision and, therefore, the State lacks jurisdiction to prosecute defendants.

We agree with the parties that our decision in People v Calandra (supra) is entirely dispositive of this appeal. We note that, but for the pendency of the present appeal, defendants would have grounds to vacate the judgments against them pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (a) and (2) (b).

Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting defendants, after jury trial, of violations of Banking [644]*644Law § 673, is reversed, on consent, the judgments vacated and the indictments dismissed, without prejudice to any further rights the parties may have. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Defendants, former officers of a national bank, by way of motion, seek an order reversing a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting them, after jury trial, of violations of Banking Law § 673. Movants assert, and the People agree, that the convictions must be vacated on the basis of this Court’s ruling in People v Calandra and People v Levine (164 AD2d 638, Iv denied 77 NY2d 997), which reversed prior convictions against defendants, also involving asserted violations of Banking Law § 673, on the ground that the State law is in conflict with a parallel Federal provision and, therefore, the State lacks jurisdiction to prosecute defendants.

We agree with the parties that our decision in People v Calandra (supra) is entirely dispositive of this appeal. We note that, but for the pendency of the present appeal, defendants would have grounds to vacate the judgments against them pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (a) and (2) (b).

Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting defendants, after jury trial, of violations of Banking [644]*644Law § 673, is reversed, on consent, the judgments vacated and the indictments dismissed, without prejudice to any further rights the parties may have. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 643, 595 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calandra-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack