People v. Calabrese
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6448 (People v. Calabrese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J., at pleas; Zaro, J., at sentences), both imposed February 10, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342 [2015]; People v English, 142 AD3d 1103 [2016]; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146 [2014]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 6448, 153 A.D.3d 1268, 59 N.Y.S.3d 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-calabrese-nyappdiv-2017.