People v. Cajigas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cajigas

115 A.D.3d 505, 981 N.Y.S.2d 913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.3d 505 (People v. Cajigas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cajigas, 115 A.D.3d 505, 981 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered January 15, 2009, as amended January 23, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Notwithstanding any weaknesses in the victim’s testimony, that testimony was corroborated by the testimony of police officers who saw defendant discard money while being chased by the victim.

Concur— Acosta, J.E, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered January 15, 2009, as amended January 23, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Notwithstanding any weaknesses in the victim’s testimony, that testimony was corroborated by the testimony of police officers who saw defendant discard money while being chased by the victim.

Concur— Acosta, J.E, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.3d 505, 981 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cajigas-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack