People v. Cain

291 A.D.2d 326, 737 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2031
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 326 (People v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cain, 291 A.D.2d 326, 737 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J., on motions; James Yates, J., at jury trial [327]*327and sentence), rendered June 25, 1997, convicting defendant of attempted grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of lVs to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s speedy trial motion was properly denied. Except as indicated, the record supports the court’s findings of excludability. The period from April 11 to May 30, 1996 is excludable under CPL 30.30 (4) (e) because of the People’s reasonable and diligent efforts in obtaining defendant from federal custody and under CPL 30.30 (4) (f) to allow defendant time to obtain new counsel. The periods from July 25 to October 17, 1996, November 1, 1996 to January 6, 1997, and April 10 to May 15, 1997, are excludable under CPL 30.30 (4) (a) as reasonable delay resulting from the extensive motion practice in this case and the People’s need for a reasonable time to prepare for trial after the rendering of decisions on motions (see, People v David, 253 AD2d 642, 645, lv denied 92 NY2d 948). We find, however, that the 10-day period from January 6, 1997 to January 16, 1997 and the 14-day period from March 13 to March 27, 1997 are chargeable to the People for their trial unreadiness. We therefore conclude that no more than 121 days of delay are chargeable to the People, and that consequently no violation of CPL 30.30 has been established. Assuming, without deciding, that the Agreement on Detainers (CPL 580.20) applies to this case, we find no violation of that statute. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gourdine
2024 NY Slip Op 51031(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)
People v. Abundis (Johnny)
70 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Silverstri
48 Misc. 3d 810 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.D.2d 326, 737 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cain-nyappdiv-2002.