People v. Cain
This text of 750 N.W.2d 175 (People v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dale CAIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Houlihan, 480 Mich. 1165, 746 N.W.2d 879 (2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
750 N.W.2d 175, 481 Mich. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cain-mich-2008.