People v. Cahill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cahill

54 A.D.2d 736, 387 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 736 (People v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cahill, 54 A.D.2d 736, 387 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 14, 1976, which, inter alia, upon inspection of the Grand Jury minutes, dismissed the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, defendants’ motion denied insofar as it sought dismissal of the indictment, and indictment reinstated. The evidence presented to a Grand Jury must be the equivalent of prima facie proof that the crime charged has been committed (People v Peetz, 7 NY2d 147, 149; accord People v Mayo, 36 NY2d 1002; People v Haney, 30 NY2d 328, 335-336). The evidence before the Grand Jury on the instant indictment meets the requisite legal standard. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 14, 1976, which, inter alia, upon inspection of the Grand Jury minutes, dismissed the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, defendants’ motion denied insofar as it sought dismissal of the indictment, and indictment reinstated. The evidence presented to a Grand Jury must be the equivalent of prima facie proof that the crime charged has been committed (People v Peetz, 7 NY2d 147, 149; accord People v Mayo, 36 NY2d 1002; People v Haney, 30 NY2d 328, 335-336). The evidence before the Grand Jury on the instant indictment meets the requisite legal standard. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 736, 387 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cahill-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack