People v. Cadogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cadogan

27 A.D.2d 570, 277 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2735

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 570 (People v. Cadogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cadogan, 27 A.D.2d 570, 277 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Pour orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, one dated October 22, 1965, two dated December 6, 1965, and one dated August 12, 1964, respectively, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from a fifth order of said court, dated October 22, 1965, dismissed. That order was superseded by an order dated November 24, 1965, granting appellant’s motion for reargument and, upon reargument, adhering to the original decision. We have, however, considered the merits of appellant’s contentions, and were this appeal properly before us, we would affirm. (The order .of the court dated August 12, 1964, [571]*571supra, was previously affirmed on March 8, 1965 [see 23 A D 2d 722], but on June 17, 1965, upon defendant’s motion, the order of affirmance was vacated and reargument of the appeal granted.) Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pour orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, one dated October 22, 1965, two dated December 6, 1965, and one dated August 12, 1964, respectively, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from a fifth order of said court, dated October 22, 1965, dismissed. That order was superseded by an order dated November 24, 1965, granting appellant’s motion for reargument and, upon reargument, adhering to the original decision. We have, however, considered the merits of appellant’s contentions, and were this appeal properly before us, we would affirm. (The order .of the court dated August 12, 1964, [571]*571supra, was previously affirmed on March 8, 1965 [see 23 A D 2d 722], but on June 17, 1965, upon defendant’s motion, the order of affirmance was vacated and reargument of the appeal granted.) Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 570, 277 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cadogan-nyappdiv-1966.