People v. Cadenas

98 A.D.3d 1061, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed June 17, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.PJ., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cadenas, 98 A.D.3d 1061, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

98 A.D.3d 1061 (People v. Cadenas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Wright
89 A.D.3d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)