Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Cadenas

People v. Cadenas

98 A.D.3d 1061, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.D.3d 1061 (People v. Cadenas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cadenas, 98 A.D.3d 1061, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed June 17, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.PJ., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Wright
89 A.D.3d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A.D.3d 1061, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cadenas-nyappdiv-2012.