People v. Cade
This text of 188 A.D.2d 1088 (People v. Cade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing or to raise the issue by a motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for review the argument that his guilty plea should not have been accepted (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858; see also, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 1088, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cade-nyappdiv-1992.