People v. Cabot

178 N.Y.S.3d 206, 210 A.D.3d 902, 2022 NY Slip Op 06487
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 2022
DocketInd. No. 9987/17
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 N.Y.S.3d 206 (People v. Cabot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cabot, 178 N.Y.S.3d 206, 210 A.D.3d 902, 2022 NY Slip Op 06487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Cabot (2022 NY Slip Op 06487)
People v Cabot
2022 NY Slip Op 06487
Decided on November 16, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.

2019-02485
(Ind. No. 9987/17)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jacob Cabot, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jean M. Joyce, and Julieanne Yanez of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deborah A. Dowling, J.), rendered January 3, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court should have granted those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials. However, the defendant withdrew all motions, both pending and decided, as a condition of his plea of guilty. By withdrawing those motions, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the court's suppression ruling (see People v Abney, 10 AD3d 617, 618; People v Jones, 288 AD2d 322; People v Lyle, 221 AD2d 475; see also People v King, 115 AD3d 986, 987; cf. People v Burbridge, 194 AD3d 831, 832).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CHRISTOPHER and WARHIT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Foy
2025 NY Slip Op 02795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Michel
200 N.Y.S.3d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 N.Y.S.3d 206, 210 A.D.3d 902, 2022 NY Slip Op 06487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cabot-nyappdiv-2022.