People v. Cabezudo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cabezudo

51 A.D.3d 814, 856 N.Y.S.2d 866

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 2008·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 17, 2003 (People v Cabezudo, 303 AD2d 596 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 25, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.P, Rivera, Spolzino and Belen, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 17, 2003 (People v Cabezudo, 303 AD2d 596 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 25, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.P, Rivera, Spolzino and Belen, JJ, concur.

People v. Cabezudo, 51 A.D.3d 814, 856 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

51 A.D.3d 814 (People v. Cabezudo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related