People v. Caballero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Caballero

240 A.D.2d 188, 658 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5970

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 188 (People v. Caballero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Caballero, 240 A.D.2d 188, 658 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered January 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant made no motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory or constitutional speedy trial grounds, appellate review of those issues is foreclosed (People v Jordan, 62 NY2d 825, 826; People v James, 188 AD2d 296). Furthermore, review of the statutory speedy trial claim is foreclosed by defendant’s plea (People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009), as well as by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273), and review of the constitutional issue is precluded by the lack of an adequate record.

In light of the total absence of factual support for defendant’s claim of innocence, and since the record demonstrates that defendant’s plea was voluntary and knowing, the court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea without further inquiry (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered January 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant made no motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory or constitutional speedy trial grounds, appellate review of those issues is foreclosed (People v Jordan, 62 NY2d 825, 826; People v James, 188 AD2d 296). Furthermore, review of the statutory speedy trial claim is foreclosed by defendant’s plea (People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009), as well as by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273), and review of the constitutional issue is precluded by the lack of an adequate record.

In light of the total absence of factual support for defendant’s claim of innocence, and since the record demonstrates that defendant’s plea was voluntary and knowing, the court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea without further inquiry (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 188, 658 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caballero-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack